Prosper in property.

← Back to Learn

Tax and structure ยท 6 min read

Negative Gearing Explained: What It Actually Is, How It Works, and What the 2026 Changes Mean

By · August 3, 2026

You have been hearing this term everywhere lately. Budget announcements, news panels, dinner table arguments, social media hot takes. Everyone has an opinion about negative gearing. But when you ask people to explain what it actually is, most of them struggle.

That is not a criticism. The term gets used so often in headlines that it starts to feel like everyone should already know what it means. And because no one wants to be the person who asks, the confusion compounds quietly. People form strong views about something they have not fully understood yet.

This article is the explanation that should have come before all the opinions. What negative gearing is, how it works mechanically, why it exists, and what the 2026 changes actually mean for Australian property investors.

What Negative Gearing Actually Means

The concept is simpler than it sounds.

When you own an investment property, you earn rental income from it. You also have costs: loan interest, property management fees, insurance, council rates, maintenance, and depreciation. Those are the costs of holding the property.

If your rental income is higher than your total costs, the property is making a profit. That is called positive gearing.

If your total costs are higher than your rental income, the property is running at a loss. That is called negative gearing.

That is all it means. The word “gearing” refers to borrowing (taking on a loan), and “negative” simply means the property costs more to hold than it brings in as rent in any given year.

The reason it matters for tax is straightforward. In Australia, that loss on your investment property can generally be offset against your other income, including your salary, when you lodge your tax return. This means your total taxable income is reduced, and you pay less tax in that year.

For someone on a high marginal tax rate, this reduction can be meaningful. It does not eliminate the loss, but it reduces the real, after-tax cost of holding the property.

A Simple Example

Say you earn $160,000 a year from your job. You buy an investment property. In the first year, the rental income comes in at $22,000, but your total holding costs (loan interest, rates, insurance, management, maintenance, and depreciation) come to $30,000.

That is a loss of $8,000 on the property.

Under the current rules, that $8,000 loss can generally be offset against your salary income. Instead of being taxed on $160,000, you may be taxed on $152,000. At a marginal rate of 37 cents in the dollar (plus the Medicare levy), that tax reduction is roughly $3,000.

You still experienced the $8,000 loss. But the tax system shared some of that cost with you, bringing the real out-of-pocket cost closer to $5,000 for the year.

The reason investors accept that annual cost is the expectation that the property will grow in value over time. If the property appreciates by more than the accumulated holding costs over a ten or fifteen year period, the investor comes out ahead. The strategy is not about the rental income in any single year. It is about the long-term wealth the asset builds while the holding costs are partly offset by the tax benefit.

This is a simplified, illustrative example. Individual circumstances vary. Always work with a qualified accountant to understand how negative gearing applies to your specific situation.

Why Negative Gearing Exists in Australia

Negative gearing is not a special property concession. It is a feature of how the Australian tax system treats income and expenses across all investment types. If you borrow to invest in shares, for example, and the interest on that loan exceeds the dividends you receive, the same principle applies. You can generally offset that investment loss against your other income.

The reason negative gearing is discussed almost exclusively in the context of property is that property is where most Australians use it. The combination of borrowing to buy, earning rental income, and claiming holding costs makes it a natural fit for the mechanism.

It has been part of the Australian tax landscape for decades. It was briefly removed for property in 1985 and reinstated in 1987. Since then, it has been a consistent feature of property investment in Australia, though the debate about whether it should be changed has never fully gone away.

The Difference Between Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Tax

These two concepts often get discussed together, but they do different things.

Negative gearing relates to the annual holding period. It is about the costs of owning the property each year versus the rental income it produces.

Capital gains tax (CGT) relates to the sale. When you eventually sell the property, any profit (the difference between what you paid and what you sold for, adjusted for costs) is subject to capital gains tax.

For individuals who have held the property for more than 12 months, a CGT discount has historically applied, reducing the taxable portion of the gain. This has been a significant part of the long-term arithmetic for property investors.

They work together in practice. An investor might accept a small annual loss during the holding period (partly offset through negative gearing), with the expectation that the capital gain on sale, after the CGT discount, will more than compensate for the accumulated holding costs. The strategy only makes sense when both sides of the equation are understood.

What Changed in 2026

In May 2026, the Federal Budget announced significant reforms to both negative gearing and capital gains tax for residential property. The legislation has since passed parliament.

Here is what the changes mean, at a high level.

For established (existing) residential properties bought after 12 May 2026:

From 1 July 2027, negative gearing losses on these properties will be quarantined. That means the loss can no longer be offset against your salary or other non-property income. Instead, it can only be offset against other residential rental income, or carried forward and applied against a future capital gain when the property is sold.

The 50% CGT discount for these properties is also being replaced with a different mechanism: cost base indexation (adjusting the purchase price for inflation) plus a 30% minimum tax on gains.

For new builds (newly constructed residential properties):

New builds are carved out of these changes. They retain access to both negative gearing against all income and the existing 50% CGT discount option.

For properties held before budget night (12 May 2026):

These are grandfathered. The existing rules continue to apply regardless of when they are sold.

The practical effect is that Australia now has a dual system for investment property. The tax treatment depends on what kind of property you buy and when you bought it.

This is a high-level summary of the reforms. The detail is important and varies by individual circumstance. The ATO, your accountant, and qualified advisors are the right sources for how these changes apply to your specific position.

What This Means Practically

If you have been watching the headlines and feeling unsure about where you stand, that is a reasonable response. The environment has genuinely become more layered, and the rules now depend on variables that did not matter before: whether the property is new or established, when it was purchased, and how different types of income interact with property losses.

Understanding what negative gearing is, how it works, and what has changed is the first step. It does not tell you what to do. But it gives you the foundation to have a more informed conversation with the right advisors about what a well-structured strategy looks like for your situation.

The investors who tend to navigate complexity well are not the ones who know every detail of every rule. They are the ones who understand the core mechanics clearly enough to ask the right questions and work with advisors who can handle the detail.

This article is educational content designed to help you think more clearly about a complex topic. It does not constitute financial, tax, or legal advice. All investment and tax strategies should be developed in conjunction with a qualified accountant and, where relevant, a licensed financial adviser. Tax laws change and individual circumstances vary.

Want to understand what a structured strategy looks like for your situation? Book a Property Wealth Mapping Session with Prosper in Property. No sales pitch, no pressure. Just clarity on where you are and what is realistically possible.

If it is easier to just talk it through, book a Property Wealth Mapping Session.

Book a session